Welcome to Tashkent

We hope to see you among the participants of our conference

14–16 Oct 2025
Institute of Nuclear Physics
Asia/Tashkent timezone

COMPARISON OF POLARON MASSES IN LSCO AND YBCO

Not scheduled
20m
Institute of Nuclear Physics

Institute of Nuclear Physics

Ulugbek town, Tashkent, 100214, Uzbekistan
Radiation physics and radiation materials science Radiation physics and radiation materials science

Speaker

Sardorbek Otajonov (Nukus State Pedagogical Institute)

Description

We compared polaron masses obtained from a Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) based estimate of the superconducting transition temperature in two cuprates: LSCO and YBCO. The method assumes that the experimentally measured superconducting critical temperature T_c can be associated with the BEC temperature T_BEC of preformed intersite bipolarons (or, more generally, bosonic charge carriers). From the BEC relation one obtains an estimate of the boson mass and — taking into account lattice anisotropy — the polaron masses both in three dimensions and inside the CuO2 planes. We use published experimental inputs for lattice parameters, anisotropy factors, and T_c from the literature [1-7]. The BEC temperature for an ideal boson gas is: T_BEC=(3.31ℏ^2 n^(2⁄3))⁄(k_B m), where m is the boson mass and n is density. For quasi-two-dimensional systems the scaling changes, but for the dilute, screened cuprate case we assume T_c ≈ T_BEC as a working hypothesis [7,8]. Consequently, the boson mass (and thus the polaron mass) can be estimated from the experimental T_c and carrier density. In YBCO, the boson density is related to hole content p and unit-cell volume V_a by: n_b=p⁄((2V_a)). The oxygen–hole mapping used here is [9]: p(x) = { x³ ,0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5,(x - 0.5)³ + 0.125 ,0.5 < x ≤ 1. Because YBCO is strongly anisotropic, the 3D polaron mass m_p is related to the in-plane (m_(p,ab)) and out-of-plane (m_(p,c)) masses via: m_p=m_(p,ab)^(2⁄3)∙m_(p,c)^(1⁄3). Introducing the mass anisotropy parameter γ_m^2= m_(p,c)/ m_(p,ab), this becomes: m_p=γ_m^(2⁄3)∙m_(p,ab). Equating experimental T_c (x) to T_BEC (Eq. above) with n=n_b and m=2m_p, we solve for m_p and then use the anisotropy relation to extract m_(p,ab). The YBCO unit-cell volume is fit approximately by: V_a (x)≈176.58703- 3.32613∙x. An empirical anisotropy form is: γ_m (x)≈γ_(m,0) + γ ̃m exp⁡[-x/x ̃], where γ(m,0)=-0.186708 , γ ̃m=924.44601 and x ̃=0.18492 . The resulting YBCO 3D polaron mass m_p (p) shows an inverse correlation with T_c (p): m_p (p) ∝T_c^(-1) (p). Numerically, m_p decreases from very large values in the strongly underdoped region to values below ~9 m_e near optimal doping, then increases again in the heavily overdoped regime. The in-plane mass m(p,ab) rises monotonically with oxygen/hole doping — from ~0.5 m_e in deeply underdoped samples to >10 m_e in fully oxygenated YBCO — mainly because γ_m decreases sharply with p. The obtained results are in good agreement with the experimental data of works [10,11].
For LSCO, we used the Presland et al. [12] empirical dome formula: T_c (x)=T_(c,max) [ 1 - 82.6 (x - 0.16)² ]. We also compared to the Marino et al. [7] theoretical T_c (x) expression (given in their text). The input lattice parameters — pseudo-tetragonal ã, unit-cell volume V_a=ã²c, and anisotropy γ_m (x) — were taken from Radaelli et al. [1] and various magnetotransport/penetration-depth studies [2-5]. An empirical fit of LSCO anisotropy is: 〖γ̃〗m (x) = 11.28421 + 275.64904 exp(-19.84499 x) The unit-cell volume fit is: V_a (x) = 189.5474 - 13.6024 x + 13.7927 x² (extrapolated from [1]). Applying the same BEC inversion (Eq. above) yields LSCO 3D polaron masses m_p (x) in the range ~20–30 m_e for underdoped and optimally doped compositions — systematically lower (by about a factor of two) than [6], but in good agreement with modern cyclotron and optical mass measurements [13, 14] for in-plane m(p,ab). LSCO shows the same inverse correlation m_p∝T_c^(-1), with divergences near the superconducting dome edges x_SC^±, two quantum critical points where the superconducting dome starts at T=0, consistent with the BEC model.
Both cuprates exhibit the same BEC-driven fingerprint: larger polaron (bipolaron) masses correspond to lower T_c, and vice versa. However, doping trends differ — YBCO shows nonmonotonic 3D mass behavior (minimum near optimal p), while LSCO’s 3D masses are moderate and span a narrower range. In-plane masses for both systems agree better with experimental effective masses when γ_m (x) is included. Differences with earlier theoretical estimates can be traced to carrier density assumptions, anisotropy treatment, and whether T_c was equated to T_BEC. This comparison underscores the utility of a common BEC framework for unifying mass determinations and isolating material-specific effects such as anisotropy, unit-cell volume, and hole mapping.
References
P.G. Radaelli et al., Structural and superconducting properties of La2-xSrxCuO4 as a function of Sr content, Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 4163–4175
M. Suzuki, M. Hikita, Resistive transition, magnetoresistance, and anisotropy in La2-𝑥Sr𝑥CuO4 single-crystal thin films, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991) 249–261
T. Kimura et al., Compositional dependence of transport anisotropy in large (La,Sr)2CuO4 single crystals and second peak in magnetization curves, Physica C 192 (1992) 247–252
T. Kimura et al., Magnetic torque in La2-xSrxCuO4-𝛿 single crystals with various carrier doping states, in: Kaoru Yamafuji, Tadataka Morishita (Eds.), Advances in Superconductivity VII, Springer Japan, Tokyo, 1995, pp. 539–542
T. Shibauchi, H. Kitano, K. Uchinokura, A. Maeda, T. Kimura, K. Kishio, Anisotropic penetration depth in La2-𝑥Sr𝑥CuO4, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 2263–2266
A. S. Alexandrov and V. V. Kabanov, “Parameter-free expression for superconducting 𝑇c in cuprates” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 59 (21), p. 13628, 1999.
E.C. Marino et al., Superconducting and pseudogap transition temperatures in high-𝑇𝑐 cuprates and the 𝑇𝑐 dependence on pressure, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 33 (2020) 035009
A. S. Alexandrov, Theory of Superconductivity: From Weak to Strong Coupling, Institute of Physics Publishing, 2003
M. Muroi et al., “Charge transfer, phase separation and percolative superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6+y” Physica C, vol. 246, p. 357, 1995
B. J. Ramshaw et al., “Quasiparticle mass enhancement approaching optimal doping in a high-T_c superconductor,” Science, vol. 348, p. 317, 2015.
W. Tozer et al., “Absence of Fermi surface reconstruction in pressure-driven overdoped YBCO” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 110, 144508, 2024.
M.R. Presland et al., General trends in oxygen stoichiometry effects on 𝑇𝑐 in Bi and Tl superconductors, Physica C 176 (1991) 95–105
W.J. Padilla et al., Constant effective mass across the phase diagram of high- 𝑇𝑐 cuprates, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 060511
A. Legros et al., Evolution of the cyclotron mass with doping in La2-xSrxCuO4, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 195110

Primary author

Sardorbek Otajonov (Nukus State Pedagogical Institute)

Co-author

Mr Bahram Yavidov (Nukus State Pedagogical Institute)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.